You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing the cost of essential nutrients from different food sources in the American diet using NHANES 2011–2014
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-019-0496-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie M. Hess, Christopher J. Cifelli, Sanjiv Agarwal, Victor L. Fulgoni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Greece | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,169,481
of 24,356,663 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#512
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,850
of 368,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,356,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.