You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Roads less traveled: understanding the “why” in simulation as an integrated continuing professional development activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-019-0111-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter Tavares |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 20% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 73% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,695,892
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#82
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,553
of 360,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.