You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during elective total hip arthroplasty under regional anaesthesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc10246 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maurizio Cecconi, Nicola Fasano, Nicola Langiano, Michele Divella, Maria G Costa, Andrew Rhodes, Giorgio Della Rocca |
| Abstract |
Total hip replacement is one of the most commonly performed major orthopaedic operations. Goal-directed therapy (GDT) using haemodynamic monitoring has previously demonstrated outcome benefits in high-risk surgical patients under general anaesthesia. GDT has never been formally assessed during regional anaesthesia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 67% |
| Peru | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 18% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 24% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 70% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 34 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,838,037
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,431
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,108
of 122,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.