↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal assessment of utilities in patients with migraine: an analysis of erenumab randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longitudinal assessment of utilities in patients with migraine: an analysis of erenumab randomized controlled trials
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12955-019-1242-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gian Luca Di Tanna, Joshua K. Porter, Richard B. Lipton, Anthony J. Hatswell, Sandhya Sapra, Guillermo Villa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Other 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 12%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,254,170
of 19,451,913 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#152
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,303
of 340,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#19
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,451,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.