You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Emphysema distribution and annual changes in pulmonary function in male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Respiratory Research, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-13-31 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Naoya Tanabe, Shigeo Muro, Shiro Tanaka, Susumu Sato, Tsuyoshi Oguma, Hirofumi Kiyokawa, Tamaki Takahashi, Daisuke Kinose, Yuma Hoshino, Takeshi Kubo, Emiko Ogawa, Toyohiro Hirai, Michiaki Mishima |
Abstract |
The progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) considerably varies among patients. Those with emphysema identified by quantitative computed tomography (CT) are associated with the rapid progression assessed by forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). However, whether the rate of the decline in lung function is independently affected by the regional distribution or the severity of emphysema in the whole lung is unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Indonesia | 1 | 25% |
Mexico | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 38% |
Engineering | 4 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,417
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,305
of 174,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.