You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Endometrium and endometriosis tissue mitochondrial energy metabolism in a nonhuman primate model
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, August 2019
Hannah M. Atkins, Manish S. Bharadwaj, Anderson O’Brien Cox, Cristina M. Furdui, Susan E. Appt, David L. Caudell
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||6||15%|
|Student > Master||5||13%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||4||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||9||23%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||8||21%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||13%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||2||5%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
of 24,163,421 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 344,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,163,421 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.