↓ Skip to main content

ITD assembler: an algorithm for internal tandem duplication discovery from short-read sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ITD assembler: an algorithm for internal tandem duplication discovery from short-read sequencing data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-1031-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Navin Rustagi, Oliver A Hampton, Jie Li, Liu Xi, Richard A. Gibbs, Sharon E. Plon, Marek Kimmel, David A. Wheeler

Abstract

Detection of tandem duplication within coding exons, referred to as internal tandem duplication (ITD), remains challenging due to inefficiencies in alignment of ITD-containing reads to the reference genome. There is a critical need to develop efficient methods to recover these important mutational events. In this paper we introduce ITD Assembler, a novel approach that rapidly evaluates all unmapped and partially mapped reads from whole exome NGS data using a De Bruijn graphs approach to select reads that harbor cycles of appropriate length, followed by assembly using overlap-layout-consensus. We tested ITD Assembler on The Cancer Genome Atlas AML dataset as a truth set. ITD Assembler identified the highest percentage of reported FLT3-ITDs when compared to other ITD detection algorithms, and discovered additional ITDs in FLT3, KIT, CEBPA, WT1 and other genes. Evidence of polymorphic ITDs in 54 genes were also found. Novel ITDs were validated by analyzing the corresponding RNA sequencing data. ITD Assembler is a very sensitive tool which can detect partial, large and complex tandem duplications. This study highlights the need to more effectively look for ITD's in other cancers and Mendelian diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 30%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Computer Science 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Engineering 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,927,282
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#839
of 7,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,895
of 313,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#13
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.