↓ Skip to main content

Clinical review: Vascular access for fluid infusion in children

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical review: Vascular access for fluid infusion in children
Published in
Critical Care, June 2004
DOI 10.1186/cc2880
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikolaus A Haas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Engineering 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,397
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,873
of 62,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.