You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Working well: a systematic scoping review of the Indigenous primary healthcare workforce development literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-019-4580-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janya McCalman, Sandra Campbell, Crystal Jongen, Erika Langham, Kingsley Pearson, Ruth Fagan, Ann Martin-Sardesai, Roxanne Bainbridge |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 23% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Librarian | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,647,369
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,800
of 7,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,599
of 363,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#99
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.