You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
KALK study: ultrasound guided needling and lavage (barbotage) with steroid injection versus sham barbotage with and without steroid injection - protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, controlled, multicenter study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12891-017-1501-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stefan Moosmayer, Ole Marius Ekeberg, Hanna Bjørnsson Hallgren, Ingar Heier, Synnøve Kvalheim, Jesper Blomquist, Are Hugo Pripp, Nils Gunnar Juel, Stein Harald Kjellevold, Jens Ivar Brox, KALK study group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 17% |
Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
Researcher | 12 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 28 | 17% |
Unknown | 55 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Psychology | 3 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
Other | 12 | 7% |
Unknown | 64 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,194,194
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,355
of 4,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,661
of 324,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#50
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.