You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and Behavioral Pain Scale to assess pain in critically ill conscious and unconscious patients: prospective, observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-016-0192-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paolo Severgnini, Paolo Pelosi, Elena Contino, Elisa Serafinelli, Raffaele Novario, Maurizio Chiaranda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 66 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 24% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 74 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,386,136
of 24,162,843 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#173
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,894
of 316,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,162,843 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.