Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, November 2019

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 72 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 3 X posts from 3 X users, with an upper bound of 3,785 followers.

Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group. ICare pro shows a higher agreement with GAT over a wide range of IOP compared with NCT. https://t.co/mj1D6gN

17 Nov 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

RT GUARDiONHealth: Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group https://t.co/WiYu8iyT0O

15 Nov 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group https://t.co/T9bkQM7S1i

15 Nov 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity.