You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative RNA-sequencing-based transcriptome profiling of buds from profusely flowering ‘Qinguan’ and weakly flowering ‘Nagafu no. 2’ apple varieties reveals novel insights into the regulatory mechanisms underlying floral induction
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12870-018-1555-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xilong Chen, Siyan Qi, Dong Zhang, Youmei Li, Na An, Caiping Zhao, Juan Zhao, Kamran Shah, Mingyu Han, Libo Xing |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 26% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 37% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 19% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2018.
All research outputs
#20,588,763
of 23,173,635 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#2,531
of 3,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,084
of 436,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#95
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,173,635 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.