You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Xanthoceraside prevented synaptic loss and reversed learning-memory deficits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Physiological Sciences, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12576-019-00664-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ge Jin, Lin Zhu, Peng Liu, Qian Xu, Yue Qi, Xiaoyu Zhou, Jikai Xu, Xuefei Ji, Tianyan Chi, Libo Zou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,485,112
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#35
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,300
of 454,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.