You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae causing neonatal sepsis in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12941-019-0334-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yijun Ding, Yajuan Wang, Yingfen Hsia, Mike Sharland, Paul T. Heath |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 61 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 66 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,699,481
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#108
of 620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,384
of 361,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.