↓ Skip to main content

A single-centre, randomised controlled feasibility pilot trial comparing performance of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in surgical patients

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A single-centre, randomised controlled feasibility pilot trial comparing performance of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in surgical patients
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40814-019-0433-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice Loughnan, Carolyn Deng, Felicity Dominick, Lora Pencheva, Doug Campbell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 17%
Researcher 4 11%
Librarian 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 34%
Unspecified 6 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,554,120
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#669
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,666
of 352,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#23
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.