You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sampling strategies to measure the prevalence of common recurrent infections in longitudinal studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-7622-7-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolf-Peter Schmidt, Bernd Genser, Mauricio L Barreto, Thomas Clasen, Stephen P Luby, Sandy Cairncross, Zaid Chalabi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 17% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,600,754
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
#76
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,964
of 95,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.