↓ Skip to main content

Investigating a training supporting shared decision making (IT'S SDM 2011): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating a training supporting shared decision making (IT'S SDM 2011): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Friedemann Geiger, Katrin Liethmann, Frauke Hoffmann, Jutta Paschedag, Jürgen Kasper

Abstract

Shared Decision Making (SDM) is regarded as the best practice model for the communicative challenge of decision making about treatment or diagnostic options. However, randomized controlled trials focusing the effectiveness of SDM trainings are rare and existing measures of SDM are increasingly challenged by the latest research findings. This study will 1) evaluate a new physicians' communication training regarding patient involvement in terms of SDM, 2) validate SDM(MASS), a new compound measure of SDM, and 3) evaluate the effects of SDM on the perceived quality of the decision process and on the elaboration of the decision.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Pakistan 1 1%
Unknown 82 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 34%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Psychology 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 21 24%