↓ Skip to main content

Are volatile anesthetics neuroprotective or neurotoxic?

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Gas Research, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are volatile anesthetics neuroprotective or neurotoxic?
Published in
Medical Gas Research, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/2045-9912-2-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiyi Zuo

Abstract

Volatile anesthetics are one class of the most commonly used drugs. However, the mechanisms for these drugs to induce anesthesia are not fully understood and have been under intensive investigation. Two other effects of these anesthetics on the central nervous system, volatile anesthetics-induced neuroprotection and neurotoxicity, currently are hot research fields. Although data from animal studies for these two effects are extensive and convincing, clinical data for volatile anesthetics-induced neuroprotection are relatively weak. There is essentially lack of evidence to suggest volatile anesthetics-induced neurotoxicity in humans. In this regard, the contribution of general anesthesia/anesthetics to postoperative cognitive decline, a clinical entity whose existence has been supported by substantial evidence, also has not been established. This paper will be focused on reviewing the evidence, especially the clinical evidence, for volatile anesthetics-induced neuroprotection and neurotoxicity. Efforts will be devoted to facilitating the understanding of the two seemingly contradictory effects of these important drugs on the brain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Psychology 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 22%