↓ Skip to main content

Using imperfect data in predictive mapping of vectors: a regional example of Ixodes ricinus distribution

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using imperfect data in predictive mapping of vectors: a regional example of Ixodes ricinus distribution
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13071-019-3784-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rita Ribeiro, Jude I. Eze, Lucy Gilbert, G. R. William Wint, George Gunn, Alastair Macrae, Jolyon M. Medlock, Harriet Auty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 25%
Environmental Science 6 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,588,553
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,425
of 5,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,355
of 360,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#93
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.