You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the whole standard operating procedure for phage therapy in clinical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-019-2120-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zelin Cui, Xiaokui Guo, Tingting Feng, Li Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Austria | 2 | 15% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,784,942
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#852
of 4,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,741
of 376,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#20
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.