↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
631 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-6-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Penny F Whiting, Marie E Weswood, Anne WS Rutjes, Johannes B Reitsma, Patrick NM Bossuyt, Jos Kleijnen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 348 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 21%
Researcher 53 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 91 25%
Unknown 42 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 165 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 61 17%
Unknown 66 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,608,116
of 17,360,236 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#856
of 1,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,505
of 269,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,360,236 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them