You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CEL-Seq2: sensitive highly-multiplexed single-cell RNA-Seq
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-016-0938-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamar Hashimshony, Naftalie Senderovich, Gal Avital, Agnes Klochendler, Yaron de Leeuw, Leon Anavy, Dave Gennert, Shuqiang Li, Kenneth J. Livak, Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen, Yuval Dor, Aviv Regev, Itai Yanai |
| Abstract |
Single-cell transcriptomics requires a method that is sensitive, accurate, and reproducible. Here, we present CEL-Seq2, a modified version of our CEL-Seq method, with threefold higher sensitivity, lower costs, and less hands-on time. We implemented CEL-Seq2 on Fluidigm's C1 system, providing its first single-cell, on-chip barcoding method, and we detected gene expression changes accompanying the progression through the cell cycle in mouse fibroblast cells. We also compare with Smart-Seq to demonstrate CEL-Seq2's increased sensitivity relative to other available methods. Collectively, the improvements make CEL-Seq2 uniquely suited to single-cell RNA-Seq analysis in terms of economics, resolution, and ease of use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| China | 2 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 19 | 68% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1153 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 281 | 24% |
| Researcher | 205 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 137 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 104 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 53 | 4% |
| Other | 140 | 12% |
| Unknown | 261 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 380 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 263 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 44 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 41 | 3% |
| Other | 107 | 9% |
| Unknown | 282 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#793,413
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#516
of 4,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,813
of 313,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#10
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.