↓ Skip to main content

Reduction in new-onset diabetes mellitus after renal transplant with erythropoietin-stimulating agents: a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reduction in new-onset diabetes mellitus after renal transplant with erythropoietin-stimulating agents: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40697-016-0114-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tess Montada-Atin, Diana Choi, Minna Woo, Ravi Retnakaran, Michael Huang, G. V. Ramesh Prasad, Jeffrey S. Zaltzman

Abstract

Studies have shown that erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) protect mice against the development of diabetes through direct effects on pancreatic ß cells. However, the effect of ESAs on the incidence of diabetes in humans has not been well studied. It is unknown whether exposure to ESAs is associated with a reduced incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT). The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between ESA exposure post-renal transplant and the development of NODAT. We performed a single center, retrospective cohort analysis. We compared patients who received a first live or deceased donor renal allograft, with any exposure to an ESA vs. those without such exposure and who developed NODAT and who did not. Patients with a prior history of diabetes mellitus or multi-organ transplant, including a second renal transplant were excluded. NODAT was defined based on the 2008 Canadian Diabetes Association criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors independently associated with NODAT. One hundred thirty-two (29 %) patients were exposed to an ESA, four of which developed NODAT compared to 128 who did not develop NODAT (p < 0.0001). Of those not exposed to an ESA, 15 % (48/319) developed NODAT. By Fisher's exact test, exposure to an ESA at any time post-transplant reduced the risk of developing NODAT; odds ratio (OR) = 0.08, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (0.018-0.352), p = 0.0008. Older age; OR = 1.41, 95 % CI (1.036-1.933), p < 0.02, higher random blood sugar at discharge; OR = 1.30, 95 % CI (1.077-1.57), p < 0.006 and deceased donor; OR 2.18 CI (1.009-4.729), p = 0.04 were associated with an increased risk of NODAT. The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, single center, and homogenous population; thus, generalizability of the results must be approached with caution. ESA exposure may be associated with a reduced incidence of NODAT in the post-renal transplant population. The role of ESA in preventing NODAT requires further investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,784,639
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
#376
of 620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,817
of 312,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.