Title |
Validation of T2* in-line analysis for tissue iron quantification at 1.5 T
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-016-0243-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohammed H. Alam, Taigang He, Dominique Auger, Gillian C. Smith, Peter Drivas, Rick Wage, Cemil Izgi, Karen Symmonds, Andreas Greiser, Bruce S. Spottiswoode, Lisa Anderson, David Firmin, Dudley J. Pennell |
Abstract |
There is a need for improved worldwide access to tissue iron quantification using T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). One route to facilitate this would be simple in-line T2* analysis widely available on MR scanners. We therefore compared our clinically validated and established T2* method at Royal Brompton Hospital (RBH T2*) against a novel work-in-progress (WIP) sequence with in-line T2* measurement from Siemens (WIP T2*). Healthy volunteers (n = 22) and patients with iron overload (n = 78) were recruited (53 males, median age 34 years). A 1.5 T study (Magnetom Avanto, Siemens) was performed on all subjects. The same mid-ventricular short axis cardiac slice and transaxial slice through the liver were used to acquire both RBH T2* images and WIP T2* maps for each participant. Cardiac white blood (WB) and black blood (BB) sequences were acquired. Intraobserver, interobserver and interstudy reproducibility were measured on the same data from a subset of 20 participants. Liver T2* values ranged from 0.8 to 35.7 ms (median 5.1 ms) and cardiac T2* values from 6.0 to 52.3 ms (median 31 ms). The coefficient of variance (CoV) values for direct comparison of T2* values by RBH and WIP were 6.1-7.8 % across techniques. Accurate delineation of the septum was difficult on some WIP T2* maps due to artefacts. The inability to manually correct for noise by truncation of erroneous later echo times led to some overestimation of T2* using WIP T2* compared with the RBH T2*. Reproducibility CoV results for RBH T2* ranged from 1.5 to 5.7 % which were better than the reproducibility of WIP T2* values of 4.1-16.6 %. Iron estimation using the T2* CMR sequence in combination with Siemens' in-line data processing is generally satisfactory and may help facilitate global access to tissue iron assessment. The current automated T2* map technique is less good for tissue iron assessment with noisy data at low T2* values. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 18% |
Spain | 2 | 18% |
Argentina | 1 | 9% |
New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 24% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 41% |
Engineering | 3 | 10% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 24% |