@treebeard83 @TakeThatDarwin @blokkadeleider Already did. But I’m curious, why just fossil evidence? Why not genetic evidence like… https://t.co/9hNXaPndcN
by the way for creationist responses, not a single one of them had any refutation for evidence of common descent from NANOG family of pseudogenes. the evidence from endogenous retroviruses and other genetic markers constitutes an irrefutable case for comm
Human genome consists of 11 NANOG pseudogenes,10 retropseudogenes and 1 duplication pseudogene. When Daniel Fairbanks and Peter Maughan examined chimpanzee's genome, they found 10 of those at their expected orthologous chromosomal positions. https://t.co/y
@Trey_Explainer Human genome consists of 11 NANOG pseudogenes,10 retropseudogenes and 1 duplication pseudogene. When Daniel Fairbanks and Peter Maughan examined chimpanzee's genome, they found 10 of those at their expected orthologous chromosomal positions