You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-43 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karel O'Brien, Craig Campbell, Leanne Brown, Lisa Wenger, Vibhuti Shah |
Abstract |
The use of mechanical ventilation is associated with lung injury in preterm infants and therefore the goal is to avoid or minimize its use. To date there is very little consensus on what is considered the "best non-invasive ventilation mode" to be used post-extubation. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP-NCPAP) vs. NCPAP in facilitating sustained extubation in infants ≤ 1,250 grams. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 133 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
Researcher | 15 | 11% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 21% |
Unknown | 36 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 45 | 33% |