↓ Skip to main content

Chromosomes in a genome-wise order: evidence for metaphase architecture

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cytogenetics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chromosomes in a genome-wise order: evidence for metaphase architecture
Published in
Molecular Cytogenetics, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13039-016-0243-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anja Weise, Samarth Bhatt, Katja Piaszinski, Nadezda Kosyakova, Xiaobo Fan, Annelore Altendorf-Hofmann, Alongklod Tanomtong, Arunrat Chaveerach, Marcelo Bello de Cioffi, Edivaldo de Oliveira, Joachim-U. Walther, Thomas Liehr, Jyoti P. Chaudhuri

Abstract

One fundamental finding of the last decade is that, besides the primary DNA sequence information there are several epigenetic "information-layers" like DNA-and histone modifications, chromatin packaging and, last but not least, the position of genes in the nucleus. We postulate that the functional genomic architecture is not restricted to the interphase of the cell cycle but can also be observed in the metaphase stage, when chromosomes are most condensed and microscopically visible. If so, it offers the unique opportunity to directly analyze the functional aspects of genomic architecture in different cells, species and diseases. Another aspect not directly accessible by molecular techniques is the genome merged from two different haploid parental genomes represented by the homologous chromosome sets. Our results show that there is not only a well-known and defined nuclear architecture in interphase but also in metaphase leading to a bilateral organization of the two haploid sets of chromosomes. Moreover, evidence is provided for the parental origin of the haploid grouping. From our findings we postulate an additional epigenetic information layer within the genome including the organization of homologous chromosomes and their parental origin which may now substantially change the landscape of genetics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Researcher 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,800,994
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cytogenetics
#210
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,946
of 299,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cytogenetics
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.