↓ Skip to main content

The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale: validation of the Japanese version

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale: validation of the Japanese version
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0825-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yosuke Tanabe, Kunihiko Hayashi, Yuki Ideno

Abstract

The present study investigated the reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale, designed to assess internalized stigma experienced by people with mental illness. A survey was conducted with 173 outpatients with mental illness who attended psychiatric clinics on a regular basis. A retest was conducted with 51 participants to evaluate the scale's psychometric properties. The alpha coefficient for the overall internal consistency was 0.91, and the coefficients of the individual ISMI subscales ranged from 0.57 to 0.81. The test-retest reliability was r = 0.85 (n = 51, P < 0.01). In terms of criterion-related validity, the Japanese version of the ISMI scale was significantly correlated with the Beck Depression Inventory (r = 0.61, P < 0.01), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (r = -0.53, P < 0.01), and the Empowerment Scale (r = -0.52, P < 0.01). In addition, factor analyses of the ISMI items demonstrated a four-factor solution for the alienation, stereotype endorsement, discrimination experience, and social withdrawal subscales, with the stigma resistance items excluded. The Japanese version of the ISMI scale demonstrated similar reliability and validity to the original English version. Therefore, the Japanese version of the ISMI scale may be an effective and valid tool to measure internalized stigma among Japanese people who have a mental illness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 47 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,800,994
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,685
of 4,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,075
of 299,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#88
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.