↓ Skip to main content

Artemisinin-based combination therapy does not measurably reduce human infectiousness to vectors in a setting of intense malaria transmission

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Artemisinin-based combination therapy does not measurably reduce human infectiousness to vectors in a setting of intense malaria transmission
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernadette J Huho, Gerard F Killeen, Heather M Ferguson, Adriana Tami, Christian Lengeler, J Derek Charlwood, Aniset Kihonda, Japhet Kihonda, S Patrick Kachur, Thomas A Smith, Salim MK Abdulla

Abstract

Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for treating malaria has activity against immature gametocytes. In theory, this property may complement the effect of terminating otherwise lengthy malaria infections and reducing the parasite reservoir in the human population that can infect vector mosquitoes. However, this has never been verified at a population level in a setting with intense transmission, where chronically infectious asymptomatic carriers are common and cured patients are rapidly and repeatedly re-infected.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 197 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Student > Master 11 5%
Other 6 3%
Student > Bachelor 4 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 139 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 141 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#6,722,819
of 23,700,294 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,904
of 5,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,560
of 163,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#20
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,700,294 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.