↓ Skip to main content

Serum peptidome patterns of breast cancer based on magnetic bead separation and mass spectrometry analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serum peptidome patterns of breast cancer based on magnetic bead separation and mass spectrometry analysis
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-7-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nai-Jun Fan, Chun-Fang Gao, Guang Zhao, Xiu-Li Wang, Qing-Yin Liu

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world, and the identification of biomarkers for the early detection of breast cancer is a relevant target. The present study aims to determine serum peptidome patterns for screening of breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 438 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 2%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 1%
Student > Bachelor 4 <1%
Student > Master 3 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 415 95%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 <1%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 416 95%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,773
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#755
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,580
of 161,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.