You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Infant feeding bottle design, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-5-150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
MS Fewtrell, K Kennedy, R Nicholl, A Khakoo, A Lucas |
| Abstract |
Whether the design of an anti-vacuum infant feeding bottle influences infant milk intake, growth or behavior is unknown, and was the subject of this randomized trial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,402,558
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#315
of 4,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,946
of 158,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#5
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.