You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Self management, joint protection and exercises in hand osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial with cost effectiveness analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krysia S Dziedzic, Susan Hill, Elaine Nicholls, Alison Hammond, Helen Myers, Tracy Whitehurst, Jo Bailey, Charlotte Clements, David GT Whitehurst, Sue Jowett, June Handy, Rhian W Hughes, Elaine Thomas, Elaine M Hay |
| Abstract |
There is limited evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of occupational therapy (OT) approaches in the management of hand osteoarthritis (OA). Joint protection and hand exercises have been proposed by European guidelines, however the clinical and cost effectiveness of each intervention is unknown.This multicentre two-by-two factorial randomised controlled trial aims to address the following questions:• Is joint protection delivered by an OT more effective in reducing hand pain and disability than no joint protection in people with hand OA in primary care?• Are hand exercises delivered by an OT more effective in reducing hand pain and disability than no hand exercises in people with hand OA in primary care?• Which of the four management approaches explored within the study (leaflet and advice, joint protection, hand exercise, or joint protection and hand exercise combined) provides the most cost-effective use of health care resources |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 26% |
| Unknown | 48 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,773
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,109
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,370
of 116,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#41
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.