↓ Skip to main content

Modified high dorsal procedure for performing isolated anatomic total caudate lobectomy (with video)

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modified high dorsal procedure for performing isolated anatomic total caudate lobectomy (with video)
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12957-016-0896-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshiya Ochiai, Hiromichi Ishii, Atsushi Toma, Takeshi Ishimoto, Yusuke Yamamoto, Ryo Morimura, Hisashi Ikoma, Eigo Otsuji

Abstract

Isolated anatomic total caudate lobectomy is indicated in patients who have liver tumors limited to the caudate lobe. However, isolated caudate lobe resection is a challenging surgical procedure that required safe and reliable techniques. All portal and hepatic veins that connect this area originate from the first branch of the portal vein or vena cava; therefore, the operator must be cautious of the potential for massive bleeding. The important points regarding the safety of our procedure include creating an optimal surgical view and preparing for accidental bleeding before parenchymal dissection. Sufficient mobilization and removal of Spiegel's lobe from the left to the right side of the vena cava allows the operator to perform parenchymal dissection under a right- or front-side view. We have performed this technique in two patients with HCC and one patient with primary cystadenocarcinoma. The average operative time and amount of blood loss were 435 min and 1137 ml, respectively. No operative mortalities or postoperative complications were observed in any of the patients. Our three patients are currently doing well without any recurrence. Our modified high dorsal resection procedure can be used to safely remove the entire caudate lobe.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 78%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,323,943
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1,582
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,361
of 299,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.