↓ Skip to main content

Screening four broad categories of eating disorders: suitability of a clinical algorithm adapted from the SCOFF questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening four broad categories of eating disorders: suitability of a clinical algorithm adapted from the SCOFF questionnaire
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12888-019-2338-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Pierre Tavolacci, André Gillibert, Aurélien Zhu Soubise, Sébastien Grigioni, Pierre Déchelotte

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Unspecified 5 8%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 23 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Psychology 9 15%
Unspecified 5 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 30 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,659,074
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,316
of 4,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,360
of 457,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#42
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.