You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K Ann McKibbon, Cynthia Lokker, Nancy L Wilczynski, Donna Ciliska, Maureen Dobbins, David A Davis, R Brian Haynes, Sharon E Straus |
| Abstract |
: |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 3% |
| Canada | 9 | 3% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 286 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 20% |
| Researcher | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 15% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 20% |
| Unknown | 46 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 52 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 14% |
| Psychology | 22 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 18% |
| Unknown | 61 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,265,256
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#442
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,909
of 178,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.