You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A new instrumented method for the evaluation of gait initiation and step climbing based on inertial sensors: a pilot application in Parkinson’s disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-015-0038-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gianluca Bonora, Ilaria Carpinella, Davide Cattaneo, Lorenzo Chiari, Maurizio Ferrarin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Professor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 36 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2019.
All research outputs
#16,896,850
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#885
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,324
of 280,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.