↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Competitive interaction with keystone taxa induced negative priming under biochar amendments

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Competitive interaction with keystone taxa induced negative priming under biochar amendments
Published in
Microbiome, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40168-019-0765-8
Authors

Lijun Chen, Yuji Jiang, Chao Liang, Yu Luo, Qinsong Xu, Cheng Han, Qiguo Zhao, Bo Sun

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 33%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 46%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unknown 15 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2019.
All research outputs
#9,509,772
of 16,257,150 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#899
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,179
of 385,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#152
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,257,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.