You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimising the use of caesarean section: a generic formative research protocol for implementation preparation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-019-0827-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meghan A. Bohren, Newton Opiyo, Carol Kingdon, Soo Downe, Ana Pilar Betrán |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Serbia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2020.
All research outputs
#13,587,663
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#968
of 1,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,745
of 457,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#17
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.