↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: ‘Effects of milk containing only A2 beta casein versus milk containing both A1 and A2 beta casein proteins on gastrointestinal physiology, symptoms of discomfort, and cognitive behavior…

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 898)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
70 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: ‘Effects of milk containing only A2 beta casein versus milk containing both A1 and A2 beta casein proteins on gastrointestinal physiology, symptoms of discomfort, and cognitive behavior of people with self-reported intolerance to traditional cows’ milk’
Published in
Nutrition Journal, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12937-016-0164-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sun Jianqin, Xu Leiming, Xia Lu, Gregory W. Yelland, Jiayi Ni, Andrew Clarke

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Mathematics 1 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Other 2 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 548. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,520
of 8,266,357 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#650
of 270,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,266,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.