↓ Skip to main content

Techno-economic evaluation of 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugar cane bagasse and leaves integrated with the sugar-based ethanol process

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
233 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Techno-economic evaluation of 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugar cane bagasse and leaves integrated with the sugar-based ethanol process
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-5-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Macrelli, Johan Mogensen, Guido Zacchi

Abstract

Bioethanol produced from the lignocellulosic fractions of sugar cane (bagasse and leaves), i.e. second generation (2G) bioethanol, has a promising market potential as an automotive fuel; however, the process is still under investigation on pilot/demonstration scale. From a process perspective, improvements in plant design can lower the production cost, providing better profitability and competitiveness if the conversion of the whole sugar cane is considered. Simulations have been performed with AspenPlus to investigate how process integration can affect the minimum ethanol selling price of this 2G process (MESP-2G), as well as improve the plant energy efficiency. This is achieved by integrating the well-established sucrose-to-bioethanol process with the enzymatic process for lignocellulosic materials. Bagasse and leaves were steam pretreated using H3PO4 as catalyst and separately hydrolysed and fermented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 8 2%
France 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 390 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 86 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 15%
Researcher 59 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 79 19%
Unknown 62 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 24%
Engineering 88 21%
Chemical Engineering 38 9%
Chemistry 24 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 5%
Other 57 14%
Unknown 92 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,136,344
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#149
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,341
of 173,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.