↓ Skip to main content

Setup uncertainties and the optimal imaging schedule in the prone position whole breast radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Setup uncertainties and the optimal imaging schedule in the prone position whole breast radiotherapy
Published in
Radiation Oncology, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13014-019-1282-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shengyu Yao, Yin Zhang, Ke Nie, Bo Liu, Bruce G. Haffty, Nisha Ohri, Ning J. Yue

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 12 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#20,592,137
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,697
of 2,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,890
of 350,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#24
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,081 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.