↓ Skip to main content

Clinical utility of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale for the detection of depression among bariatric surgery candidates

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical utility of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale for the detection of depression among bariatric surgery candidates
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0823-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leorides Severo Duarte-Guerra, Clarice Gorenstein, Paula Francinelle Paiva-Medeiros, Marco Aurélio Santo, Francisco Lotufo Neto, Yuan-Pang Wang

Abstract

Clinical assessment of depression is an important part of pre-surgical assessment among individuals with morbid obesity. However, there is no agreed-upon instrument to identify mood psychopathology in this population. We examined the reliability and criterion validity of the clinician-administered Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the utility of a short version for bariatric surgery candidates. The sample was 374 patients with obesity, consecutively recruited from the waiting list of a bariatric surgery clinic of University Hospital, Brazil: women 80 %, mean BMI 47 kg/m(2), mean age 43.0 years. The 10-item MADRS was analyzed against the SCID-I. Items that showed small relevance to sample's characteristics and contribution to data variability were removed to develop the short 5-item version of scale. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of cutoff points of both versions MADRS, and values were plotted as a receiver operating characteristic curve. For the 10-item MADRS, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.93. When compared against SCID-I, the best cut-off threshold was 13/14, yielding sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity 0.85. Following items were removed: reduced appetite, reduced sleep, concentration difficulties, suicide thought and lassitude. The 5-item version showed an alpha coefficient of 0.94 and a best cut-off threshold of 10/11, yielding sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity 0.87. Similar overall ability to discriminate depression of almost 90 % was found for both 10-item and 5-item MADRS. The MADRS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess depressive symptoms among treatment-seeking bariatric patients. Systematic application of the abbreviated version of the MADRS can be recommended for enhancing the clinical detection of depression during perioperative period.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Psychology 9 10%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 31 36%