You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relationships between food consumption and living arrangements among university students in four European countries - A cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walid El Ansari, Christiane Stock, Rafael T Mikolajczyk |
| Abstract |
The transition of young people from school to university has many health implications. Food choice at the university can differ because of childhood food consumption patterns, sex and the living arrangements. Food consumption may change especially if students are living away from home. We aimed to assess food consumption patterns among university students from four European countries and how they differ by their living arrangements. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 557 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Jordan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 551 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 161 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 6% |
| Researcher | 25 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 73 | 13% |
| Unknown | 171 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 81 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 43 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 7% |
| Psychology | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 104 | 19% |
| Unknown | 187 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,166,456
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,320
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,618
of 175,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.