↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic analysis of Th1/Th2 cytokine concentration during antiretroviral therapy of HIV-1/HCV co-infected Patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic analysis of Th1/Th2 cytokine concentration during antiretroviral therapy of HIV-1/HCV co-infected Patients
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenzhen Kang, Yuan Li, Yan Zhuang, Ke Zhao, Dedong Huang, Yongtao Sun

Abstract

Co-infection with hepatitis C (HCV) is very common in human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infected patients. Although HIV co-infection clearly accelerates progression of HCV-related fibrosis and liver disease, controversy remains as to the impact of HCV on HIV disease progression in co-infected patients. HIV can cause immune dysfunction, in which the regulatory function of T helper (Th) cells is very essential. Moreover, cytokines derived from Th cells play a prominent role in viral infection. Investigating the functional changes of Th1 and Th2 cells in cytokine level can improve the understanding of the effect of co-infected HCV on HIV infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Master 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Chemistry 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2012.
All research outputs
#14,725,727
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,045
of 7,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,142
of 163,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#50
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.