↓ Skip to main content

An iterative design process to develop a randomized feasibility study and inform recruitment of minority women after stillbirth

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An iterative design process to develop a randomized feasibility study and inform recruitment of minority women after stillbirth
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40814-019-0526-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Huberty, Jeni Green, Katherine J. Gold, Jenn Leiferman, Joanne Cacciatore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 26 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Psychology 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 28 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#14,553,567
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#669
of 1,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,597
of 460,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#31
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.