↓ Skip to main content

UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Sarcoma Research, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 104)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas
Published in
Clinical Sarcoma Research, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13569-016-0047-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig Gerrand, Nick Athanasou, Bernadette Brennan, Robert Grimer, Ian Judson, Bruce Morland, David Peake, Beatrice Seddon, Jeremy Whelan, On behalf of the British Sarcoma Group

Abstract

This document is an update of the British Sarcoma Group guidelines published in 2010. The aim is to provide a reference standard for the clinical care of patients in the UK with bone sarcomas. Recent recommendations by the European Society of Medical Oncology, The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence have been incorporated, and the literature since 2010 reviewed. The standards represent a consensus amongst British Sarcoma Group members in 2015. It is acknowledged that these guidelines will need further updates as care evolves. The key recommendations are that bone pain or a palpable mass should always lead to further investigation and that patients with clinico-radiological findings suggestive of a primary bone tumour at any site in the skeleton should be referred to a specialist centre and managed by a fully accredited bone sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Treatment recommendations are provided for the major tumour types and for localised, metastatic and recurrent disease. Follow up schedules are suggested.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Other 27 13%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 5%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 65 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 78 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,423,150
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#31
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,213
of 298,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.