You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0867-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Krouwel, Kate Jolly, Sheila Greenfield |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 37% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 421 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 93 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Researcher | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 12% |
| Unknown | 128 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 11% |
| Psychology | 44 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 76 | 18% |
| Unknown | 142 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,377,045
of 24,498,639 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#165
of 2,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,475
of 469,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,498,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.