↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0867-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Krouwel, Kate Jolly, Sheila Greenfield

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 241 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 32%
Student > Bachelor 37 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Researcher 11 5%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 49 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 37 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 15%
Psychology 28 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 6%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 55 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,324,894
of 18,990,581 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#190
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,032
of 413,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#30
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,990,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.