You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2019
Matthew Krouwel, Kate Jolly, Sheila Greenfield
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||8||42%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||4||21%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||5%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||93||22%|
|Student > Bachelor||55||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||50||12%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||26||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||52||12%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||31||7%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||28||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,498,639 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
of 2,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 469,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,498,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.