↓ Skip to main content

Application of rapid in vitro co-culture system of macrophages and T-cell subsets to assess the immunogenicity of dogs vaccinated with live attenuated Leishmania donovani centrin deleted parasites (LdC…

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of rapid in vitro co-culture system of macrophages and T-cell subsets to assess the immunogenicity of dogs vaccinated with live attenuated Leishmania donovani centrin deleted parasites (LdCen−/−)
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1528-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelvinson Fernandes Viana, Jacqueline Araújo Fiuza, Sreenivas Gannavaram, Ranadhir Dey, Angamuthu Selvapandiyan, Daniella Castanheira Bartholomeu, Denise da Silveira-Lemos, Lilian Lacerda Bueno, Walderez Ornelas Dutra, Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Hira L. Nakhasi, Rodolfo Cordeiro Giunchetti

Abstract

Live attenuated Leishmania donovani parasites as LdCen(-/-) were shown to confer protective immunity against Leishmania infection in mice, hamsters, and dogs. Strong immunogenicity in dogs vaccinated with LdCen(-/-) has been previously reported, including increased antibody response favoring Th1 response lymphoproliferative responses, CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cells activation, increased levels of Th1 and reduction of Th2 cytokines, in addition to a significant reduction in parasite burden after 18 and 24 months post virulent parasite challenge. Aimed at validating a new method using in vitro co-culture systems with macrophages and purified CD4(+) or CD8(+) or CD4(+):CD8(+) T-cells of immunized dogs with both LdCen(-/-) and Leishmune® to assess microbicide capacity of macrophages and the immune response profile as the production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-12, IL-4 and IL-10 cytokines. Our data showed co-cultures of macrophages and purified T-cells from dogs immunized with LdCen(-/-) and challenged with L. infantum were able to identify high microbicidal activity, especially in the co-culture using CD4(+) T-cells, as compared to the Leishmune® group. Similarly, co-cultures with CD8(+) T-cells or CD4(+):CD8(+) T-cells in both experimental groups were able to detect a reduction in the parasite burden in L. infantum infected macrophages. Moreover, co-cultures using CD4(+) or CD8(+) or CD4(+):CD8(+) T-cells from immunized dogs with both LdCen(-/-) and Leishmune® were able to identify higher levels of IFN-γ and IL-12 cytokines, reduced levels of IL-4 and IL-10, and a higher IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio. While the highest IFN-γ levels and IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio were the hallmarks of LdCen(-/-) group in the co-culture using CD4(+) T-cells, resulting in strong reduction of parasitism, the Leishmune® immunization presented a differential production of TNF-α in the co-culture using CD4(+):CD8(+) T-cells. The distinct conditions of co-culture systems were validated and able to detect the induction of immune protection. The method described in this study applied a new, more accurate approach and was able to yield laboratory parameters useful to test and monitor the immunogenicity and efficacy of Leishmania vaccines in dogs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 4 5%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 13 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#14,848,594
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,084
of 5,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,483
of 298,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#97
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.