You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Is the presence of Modic changes associated with the outcomes of different treatments? A systematic critical review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-183 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rikke K Jensen, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde |
Abstract |
Modic changes (MCs) have been identified as a diagnostic subgroup associated with low back pain (LBP). The aetiology of MCs is still unknown and there is no effective treatment available. If MCs constitute a specific subgroup of LBP, it seems reasonable to expect different effects from different treatments. The objective of this systematic critical literature review was therefore to investigate if there is evidence in the literature that the presence of MCs at baseline is associated with a favourable outcome depending on the treatment provided for LBP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Greece | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
Researcher | 13 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
Other | 30 | 28% |
Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 22 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2012.
All research outputs
#14,720,444
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,212
of 4,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,509
of 122,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#30
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.